🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.